Tag Archives: Martin

Were the dice loaded in R v Barton, 2017 ABCA 216?

May 24, 2018 update at 09:44 EDM:  This just in today:   https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/17800/index.do  the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision on the Barton appeal.  In summary, it: (i)  refines the law on consent:  “While the jurisprudence has consistently referred to the relevant … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Dalla Lana v University of Alberta, 2013 ABCA 327

September 01, 2014:  I find it very interesting that, in the August 29, 2014 Alberta Court of Appeals Memorandum of Judgment on the Alberta Securities Commission case  ‘ Walton v Alberta (Securities Commission), 2014 ABCA 273:’   https://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abca/doc/2014/2014abca273/2014abca273.html the Court states: … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments